Use a simple debian/control Architecture

By switching to the "any" architecture, we no longer need to template
the debian/control file.  This simply claims that the package can be
built on any known debian arch - which we currently think is true - so
it will help future portability.
This commit is contained in:
Hamish Coleman 2023-08-28 17:30:59 +01:00
parent d7eff5313b
commit 018add0280
4 changed files with 1 additions and 6 deletions

1
.gitignore vendored
View File

@ -24,7 +24,6 @@ build
.idea
.vscode
.vs
packages/debian/debian/control
packages/debian/debian/files
*dSYM*

View File

@ -1765,8 +1765,6 @@ fi
ac_config_files="$ac_config_files debian/control"
ac_config_files="$ac_config_files Makefile"
cat >confcache <<\_ACEOF
@ -2469,7 +2467,6 @@ cat >>$CONFIG_STATUS <<\_ACEOF || ac_write_fail=1
for ac_config_target in $ac_config_targets
do
case $ac_config_target in
"debian/control") CONFIG_FILES="$CONFIG_FILES debian/control" ;;
"Makefile") CONFIG_FILES="$CONFIG_FILES Makefile" ;;
*) as_fn_error $? "invalid argument: \`$ac_config_target'" "$LINENO" 5;;

View File

@ -35,6 +35,5 @@ fi
AC_SUBST(N2N_VERSION)
AC_SUBST(EXTN)
AC_CONFIG_FILES(debian/control)
AC_CONFIG_FILES(Makefile)
AC_OUTPUT

View File

@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ Standards-Version: 4.6.0
Build-Depends:
Package: n2n
Architecture: @EXTN@
Architecture: any
Suggests: uml-utilities
Depends: ${shlibs:Depends}, ${misc:Depends}
Conflicts: n2n (<< 2.1.0-1)