Also add commit dates to make life prettier and easier
The following drivers have been updated with fixes for 6.8
- driver_rtl8811CU_rtl8821C
- driver_rtl88x2bu
- driver_rtl8811_rtl8812_rtl8814_rtl8821
The following drivers have been updated without specific 6.8 patches:
- driver_rtl8189ES (patches for 6.7, deleted two upstreamed patches)
- driver_rtl8189FS (patches for 6.7, deleted four upstreamed patches)
There are many changes in this file and its impossible to cover this with a patch for now current and all kernels back
We are using same hack in UWE drivers.
This is just a cosmetic change. Patches have been consolidated
into one patch within each corresponding linux version directory.
Added: linux-6.6 (RC-1)
Removed: linux-6.2/6.3
Signed-off-by: Patrick Yavitz <pyavitz@xxxxx.com>
Co-authored-by: Patrick Yavitz <pyavitz@xxxxx.com>
Also added some cleanup fixes to silence some of the compiler warnings,
fixes for issues during inserting and removing xradio module and fixes
for possible data corruption on vmmaped stack.
All of these fixes were taken from https://github.com/fifteenhex/xradio
* patch: misc: rtw88: wireless-next: 2023-08-25
Updated: 6.1 / 6.4
Added: 6.5
For doc sake, this update makes 6.1 slightly differrent than 6.4 and
6.5 in one particular area of main.c.
As shown here:
7746e2fa87
6.1 requires we use del_timer_sync, where the above releases use
timer_delete_sync.
Tested-on: ODROID-C4 X96-AIR BPI-CM4 (linux 6.x.y)
Signed-off-by: Patrick Yavitz <pyavitz@xxxxx.com>
* driver_rtw88: `linux-version compare "${version}" ge 6.1`
Suggested-by: @viraniac
Signed-off-by: Patrick Yavitz <pyavitz@xxxxx.com>
---------
Signed-off-by: Patrick Yavitz <pyavitz@xxxxx.com>
Co-authored-by: Patrick Yavitz <pyavitz@xxxxx.com>
With this change, setting EXTRAWIFI=no will disable all wireless
patches applied within drivers_network.sh script. Also since #5265
the rtl88x2cs patches were suppose to be not applied to 6.1+ kernel
onwards, instead they were disabled entirely. As this was done by
adding EXTRAWIFI=no, its now replaced with kernel version limit.
Keeping EXTRAWIFI=no there would have made those patches to apply
which would have changed the meaning of the flag.
Cope with the fix in stable 6.3.13 bf353116d1bf and 6.5-rc1 e8c2af660ba0
"wifi: cfg80211: fix regulatory disconnect with OCB/NAN".
That is the removal of REGULATORY_IGNORE_STALE_KICKOFF
from the wireless regulator internal API to fix any driver
that allowed OCB/NAN.
Note this code will need to be expanded once and if 6.4 include the
above fixup.
Signed-off-by: Alban Browaeys <alban.browaeys@gmail.com>
Use multiple consecutive reads in rtw_sdio_read_port() to limit the number of bytes which are copied by the host from the card in one MMC/SDIO transfer. This allows receiving a buffer that's larger than the hosts max_req_size (number of bytes which can be transferred in one MMC/SDIO transfer). As a result of this the skb_over_panic error is gone as the rtw88 driver is now able to receive more than 1536 bytes from the card (either because the incoming packet is larger than that or because multiple packets have been aggregated).
Signed-off-by: Patrick Yavitz <pyavitz@xxxxx.com>
This brings the patch set up to 2023-06-22 wireless-next
Drivers tested;
8822CS. 8821CU and 8723DS
Notables;
Not seeing random dmesg spam `rtw_8822cs failed to get tx report from firmware` which I would see on both the CS and CU from time to time.
Signed-off-by: Patrick Yavitz <pyavitz@gmail.com>
Patch set includes a complete backport of RTW88 as it currently stands, along with extras
Extra:
Patch: RTL8723DS (SDIO)
Patch: _rtw_download_firmware() warn: missing unwind goto?
Hack: SDIO RX Aggregation Limiting
I only have two units available to me with an 8822CS module and in my testing this is only required on the BPI-CM4IO. With out LIMITING the unit will either kernel panic or not be able to send or receive.
This is currently being looked into:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-wireless/CAFBinCBaXtebixKbjkWKW_WXc5k=NdGNaGUjVE8NCPNxOhsb2g@mail.gmail.com/T/#u
It may be possible to just set LIMITING across all builds, but that to me seems like a poor choice. This requires testing.
Signed-off-by: Patrick Yavitz <pyavitz@gmail.com>
