atf: once again no-warn-rwx-segment woes
- turns out everybody was wrong, including me
- some (older?) ATF sources won't work, ever; thus
- introduce ATF_SKIP_LDFLAGS=yes to skip it completely
- introduce ATF_SKIP_LDFLAGS_WL=yes to only skip the `-Wl,` prefix
- this is for ATF's that pass flag directly to linker, not gcc
- artifact-uboot: hash atf-building code into artifact version
This commit is contained in:
parent
f60c1dcf12
commit
0562e3a79f
@ -80,9 +80,10 @@ function artifact_uboot_prepare_version() {
|
||||
declare hash_hooks="undetermined"
|
||||
hash_hooks="$(echo "${extension_hooks_hashed[@]}" | sha256sum | cut -d' ' -f1)"
|
||||
|
||||
# Hash the old-timey hooks
|
||||
# Hash the old-timey hooks and regular core functions (atf code, used by u-boot build process)
|
||||
declare hash_functions="undetermined"
|
||||
calculate_hash_for_function_bodies "uboot_custom_postprocess" "write_uboot_platform" "write_uboot_platform_mtd" "setup_write_uboot_platform"
|
||||
calculate_hash_for_function_bodies "uboot_custom_postprocess" "write_uboot_platform" "write_uboot_platform_mtd" \
|
||||
"setup_write_uboot_platform" "compile_atf"
|
||||
declare hash_uboot_functions="${hash_functions}"
|
||||
|
||||
# Hash those two together
|
||||
|
||||
@ -66,14 +66,38 @@ compile_atf() {
|
||||
|
||||
# - "--no-warn-rwx-segment" is *required* for binutils 2.39 - see https://developer.trustedfirmware.org/T996
|
||||
# - but *not supported* by 2.38, brilliant...
|
||||
declare binutils_version binutils_flags_atf=""
|
||||
binutils_version=$(env PATH="${toolchain}:${toolchain2}:${PATH}" aarch64-linux-gnu-ld.bfd --version | head -1 | cut -d ")" -f 2 | xargs echo -n)
|
||||
display_alert "Binutils version for ATF" "${binutils_version}" "info"
|
||||
|
||||
if linux-version compare "${binutils_version}" gt "2.39" && linux-version compare "${binutils_version}" lt "2.42"; then
|
||||
display_alert "Binutils version for ATF" ">= 2.39 and < 2.42, adding -Wl,--no-warn-rwx-segment" "info"
|
||||
binutils_flags_atf="--no-warn-rwx-segment"
|
||||
# 2026: turns out that *gcc* is the one that takes the flag, and it might or not accept it.
|
||||
# distros patch binutils and gcc independently, since it's a security-related flag,
|
||||
# might have been backported to one and not the other. what a freaking life.
|
||||
# test both -- and only add it if _both_ support it
|
||||
function gcc_accepts_flag() {
|
||||
{ echo 'int main(){}' | "${ATF_COMPILER}gcc" -Wl,"$1" -x c - -o /dev/null > /dev/null 2>&1; } && return 0
|
||||
return 1
|
||||
}
|
||||
function ld_supports_flag() {
|
||||
{ "$("${ATF_COMPILER}gcc" -print-prog-name=ld)" --help 2> /dev/null | grep -q -- "$1"; } && return 0
|
||||
return 1
|
||||
}
|
||||
if gcc_accepts_flag --no-warn-rwx-segment; then
|
||||
display_alert "GCC supports '--no-warn-rwx-segment'" "gcc:yes - ld:tba" "debug"
|
||||
if ld_supports_flag no-warn-rwx-segment; then
|
||||
display_alert "GCC/LD supports '--no-warn-rwx-segment'" "gcc:yes - ld:yes" "debug"
|
||||
if [[ "${ATF_SKIP_LDFLAGS:-"no"}" == "yes" ]]; then # IF ATF_SKIP_LDFLAGS==yes, then skip it completely
|
||||
display_alert "Skip adding LD flag '--no-warn-rwx-segment' to TF-A build" "ATF_SKIP_LDFLAGS=${ATF_SKIP_LDFLAGS}" "info"
|
||||
elif [[ "${ATF_SKIP_LDFLAGS_WL:-"no"}" == "yes" ]]; then # IF ATF_SKIP_LDFLAGS_WL==yes, then don't add the -Wl, prefix
|
||||
display_alert "Skip adding '-Wl,' prefix to LD flag '--no-warn-rwx-segment' for TF-A build" "ATF_SKIP_LDFLAGS_WL=${ATF_SKIP_LDFLAGS_WL}" "info"
|
||||
binutils_flags_atf="--no-warn-rwx-segment"
|
||||
else
|
||||
display_alert "Adding full LD flag '-Wl,--no-warn-rwx-segment' to TF-A build" "normal" "info"
|
||||
binutils_flags_atf="-Wl,--no-warn-rwx-segment"
|
||||
fi
|
||||
else
|
||||
display_alert "LD does not support '--no-warn-rwx-segment'" "gcc: yes - ld:no" "debug"
|
||||
fi
|
||||
else
|
||||
display_alert "GCC does not support '--no-warn-rwx-segment'" "gcc: no - ld: not tested" "debug"
|
||||
fi
|
||||
unset -f gcc_accepts_flag ld_supports_flag
|
||||
|
||||
# - ENABLE_BACKTRACE="0" has been added to workaround a regression in ATF. Check: https://github.com/armbian/build/issues/1157
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user